| submit a site to this category |
| wectar web site suggestions for this odp category |
| Subcategories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ada@ | Component Frameworks@ | History@ | Humor | Java@ | Object-Oriented@ |
| Perl@ | Python@ | REBOL@ |
|
|
Programming Languages StudyURL: http://merd.sourceforge.net/pixel/language-study/ ODP description: Includes: diagram, history of languages; history of language concepts; syntax across languages; Scriptometer measures scripting ease of languages; mutability and sharing of various values in various languages. Page title: programming languages study ![]() |
|
|
Java vs. C#URL: http://www.javacamp.org/javavscsharp/index.html ODP description: Code for code comparison. All features on both languages are compared. Page title: Java VS. C# Page description: A solution to Object-Oriented Programming, a companion to your success, study notes for Java, A guidance to Java skill, Java certification ![]() |
|
|
Popular Programming LanguagesURL: http://www.scriptol.org/choose.php ODP description: Long text table compares many languages by brief descriptions matched to common tasks. Page title: Popular programming languages Page description: Choose the programming language that matches the best your needs. ![]() |
|
|
Multi-Core Ant Colony Optimization for TSP in ErlangURL: http://eric_rollins.home.mindspring.com/erlangAnt.html ODP description: Compares Erlang, GHC Haskell, Standard ML (Alice, MLton); text, tables, graphs. ![]() |
|
|
Language Options ComparisonURL: http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/langopts.htm ODP description: Compares scripting language feature options, in various categories. Pros and cons given for each feature variant. Text, code samples, table. ![]() |
|
|
Timing Trials, or, the Trials of Timing: Experiments with Scripting and User-Interface LanguagesURL: http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/bwk/interps/pap.html ODP description: By Brian Kernighan, Christopher Van Wyk. Compares how fast C, Awk, Perl, Tcl, Java, Visual Basic, Limbo, Scheme, run a range of representative tasks. Text, tables, graphs, code samples. Page title: pap ![]() |
|
|
Four-fold Increase in Productivity and QualityURL: http://www.erlang.se/publications/Ulf_Wiger.pdf ODP description: Ulf Wiger. Workshop on Formal Design of Safety Critical Embedded Systems. March 21-23, 2001, Munich. ![]() |
|
|
In Search of the Ideal Programming LanguageURL: http://members.aol.com/SergeyP/paper.html ODP description: Article by Sergey Polak. Review and comparison programming languages in search expressive, extensible, readable, safe, portable language. ![]() |
|
|
Programming Language BenchmarksURL: http://dan.corlan.net/bench.html ODP description: Compares the same program in Ada, C, Forth, FORTRAN, Java, Lisp, Perl, R, Ruby. Goal: support decisions in language choice for making compute-intensive Web programs. Text, table, code samples. Page title: Programming language benchmarks Page description: A comparison of the perfomance of compiled or interpreted code, as generated by some popular tools from some popular programming languages (C, Ada, FORTRAN, Lisp, FORTH, Java, Perl, R, Ruby) ![]() |
|
|
The ROT13 PageURL: http://www.miranda.org/~jkominek/rot13/ ODP description: ROT13 implemented in many programming languages. Page title: ROT13 ![]() |
|
|
Ada, C, C++, and Java vs. The SteelmanURL: http://www.adahome.com/History/Steelman/steeltab.htm ODP description: Compares 4 programming languages (Ada 95, C, C++, Java) with the needs of "Steelman", original 1978 requirements document for Ada language. Big detailed table. ![]() |
|
|
What Languages FixURL: http://paulgraham.com/fix.html ODP description: Compares many languages in brief text, describes each by the problem it fixes. [Paul Graham] ![]() |
|
|
Java and Smalltalk Syntax ComparedURL: http://www.chimu.com/publications/JavaSmalltalkSyntax.html ODP description: Table and notes compare some elements of syntax of Java 1.1 to Smalltalk-80. Page title: Java and Smalltalk syntax compared ![]() |
|
|
The BNF Web Club LanguageURL: http://cui.unige.ch/db-research/Enseignement/analyseinfo/ ODP description: Browse, explore some programming language syntax rules, see relations between rules, understand them via BNF (Backus-Naur Form notation) and syntactic diagrams: SQL, PL/SQL, SQL2, IDL; Ada 95, Java, Modula-2; Lazy, Lisp, M5. Page title: The BNF Web Club Language SQL, ADA, JAVA, MODULA2, PL/SQL, ... ![]() |
|
|
Dylan Competitive AnalysisURL: http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~brd/cs212/handouts/comparison.htm ODP description: Compares Dylan, Smalltalk, Objective-C, C/C++. Long document. Page title: Comparison of Dylan to C++ ![]() |
|
|
A Comparison between 10 LanguagesURL: http://www.ntecs.de/old-hp/s-direktnet/langcomp.en.html ODP description: Table compares 13 traits at top, 10 languages to side: BETA, C#, C++, C-Talk, Eiffel, Java, Object Pascal, Ruby, Sather, Smalltalk. ![]() |
|
|
Comparisons of Tcl with Other SystemsURL: http://www.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/sai/ss96/uxdb2/comparison.html ODP description: Many comparisons between Tcl/Tk and other similar systems, most copied from comp.lang.tcl. Page title: Comparisons of Tcl with other systems ![]() |
|
|
An Empirical Comparison of C, C++, Java, Perl, Python, Rexx, and Tcl for a Search/string-processing ProgramURL: http://page.mi.fu-berlin.de/prechelt/Biblio/jccpprtTR.pdf ODP description: One set of requirements, 80 implementations, coded by 74 different programmers in various languages, compared for properties: run time, memory use, source text length, comment density, program structure, reliability, effort needed. ![]() |
|
|
A Comparison between BETA, C++, Eiffel, Java, Object Pascal, Ruby and SmalltalkURL: http://www.ntecs.de/old-hp/s-direktnet/lang_cmp.en.htm ODP description: Table compares 12 traits to side, 7 languages at top. Page title: A comparison between BETA, C++, Eiffel, Java, Object Pascal, Ruby and Smalltalk Page description: A comparison between BETA, C++, Eiffel, Java, Object Pascal, Ruby and Smalltalk ![]() |
|
|
Guidelines for Choosing a Computer Language: Support for the Visionary OrganizationsURL: http://archive.adaic.com/docs/reports/lawlis/content.htm ODP description: Multipage study compares: 4GL/5GL, 3GL (Ada 95, C, C++, COBOL, FORTRAN, Java, Smalltalk), 2GL (Assembly). Divides language (definition) from traits of products that implement and support it. Several sections, tables, appendixes. Page title: Guidelines for Choosing a Computer Language: Support for the Visionary Organizations - 2nd Edition - Patricia Lawlis ![]() |
|
| |